Skip to main content
snowflakeaircon.sg

CADR Ratings: What the Clean Air Figure Counts and Assumes

Two air cleaners can print the same clean air figure while one pushes plenty of air through a coarse filter and the other little through a dense one. The rating merges those two facts on purpose, and what it merges away is worth knowing before spending.

By Team Snowflake | Updated 16 Sept 2026

What does a CADR figure actually count?

A CADR figure counts a volume, never a percentage. ANSI/AHAM AC-1 defines it as the rate of contaminant reduction in the test chamber with the unit on, minus the rate of natural decay with it off, multiplied by the chamber volume in cubic feet. The result is in cubic feet per minute.

Subtracting the natural decay is why the test runs twice. Particles settle out of still air and stick to the walls, so a machine left off would appear to clean a room; AHAM takes that baseline away so the unit is credited only with what it removed.

Two separate properties get folded together. How much air the machine draws in decides one half of the answer. How much contaminant that air gives up decides the other. A strong fan behind an open filter and a modest fan behind a dense one can land on the same number.

AHAM says as much in its own terms. Its certification guide says CADR values "are always the measurement of a unit's performance as a complete system". It adds that they "have no linear relationship to air movement or to the characteristics of any particular filter media". The same wording carries into the international documents.

Why a filter class and a flow figure will not combine into it

Neither input predicts the output on its own, and AHAM is explicit about why. Its testing FAQ says neither the quantity nor velocity of the airflow, nor the filter's efficiency, tells a buyer the amount of cleaned air generated. A filter rating describes the air passing through the element and stays silent on how much of the room's air gets there.

So a dense element in a machine that pulls little air past it scores poorly, and no line on the spec sheet shows why. Reading the filter class and rated airflow side by side will not rebuild the figure. The test measures both working together on an assembled machine.

Why one machine carries three different numbers

AC-1 runs the same machine against three test particles and reports a separate figure for each: engineered tobacco smoke for fine particles, an engineered fine dust for medium ones, and paper mulberry pollen for coarse ones, spanning roughly 0.10 to 11 micrometres.

All three are surrogates, chosen for consistency in the laboratory. AHAM describes the engineered smoke as a stand-in for cooking particles, candle soot and smoke arriving from hundreds of miles away, with particles 100 to 1,000 times smaller than a human hair. The medium grade is engineered dust, also known as Arizona road dust.

Sizes differ enough that the three results separate. AHAM publishes the ranges as 0.09 to 1.0 micrometres for smoke, 0.5 to 3.0 for dust, and 0.5 to 11.0 for pollen. A machine can be respectable at the coarse end and ordinary at the fine end, and the seal will show both.

One derived figure arrived later. AC-1-2019 introduced a PM2.5 CADR, a geometric average of the smoke result across 0.1 to 0.5 micrometres and the dust result across 0.5 to 2.5 micrometres. It recombines existing tests and adds no fourth run.

  • What the complaint is
    Cooking particles, candle soot, haze
    Which figure answers it
    Smoke CADR, 0.09 to 1.0 micrometres
    The band AHAM will certify
    10 to 450
  • What the complaint is
    Household dust and fine grit
    Which figure answers it
    Dust CADR, 0.5 to 3.0 micrometres
    The band AHAM will certify
    10 to 400
  • What the complaint is
    Pollen and coarse allergens
    Which figure answers it
    Pollen CADR, 0.5 to 11.0 micrometres
    The band AHAM will certify
    25 to 450
  • What the complaint is
    Odour, cooking gas, solvent fumes
    Which figure answers it
    None of the three
    The band AHAM will certify
    Outside the standard

Where the scale runs out

Each figure carries a floor and a ceiling written into the certification, and the ceiling arrives sooner than most expect. Above the top of the band, the chamber cannot tell machines apart, because the particles run out before the measurement does.

A machine past the top of the scale gets labelled at the scale. The programme requires the seal to read "450 CADR or greater" for smoke, with the same wording for the other two. Two units both printing 450 have both saturated the measurement, and nothing on the packaging separates them.

The chamber the number comes out of

The chamber is a fixed room, and its size is part of the definition. AHAM gives the volume as 1,008 cubic feet, or 28.4 cubic metres. Most chambers are built at ten and a half by twelve by eight feet, or 3.2 by 3.7 by 2.4 metres.

Two runs make one result. Contaminant goes into the chamber and its concentration is tracked while the machine sits idle, establishing the natural decay, then the run repeats at the same starting concentration with the machine on. The gap between the two rates is the CADR.

Placement is deliberately loose. AHAM notes that particles are not forced through the product: the unit sits on a table or the floor, and its own airflow pattern decides how much of the chamber reaches it. A recirculation fan against a wall keeps the contaminant mixed, positioned out of the machine's air path so it adds nothing to the score.

One speed setting is tested, the top one. AHAM runs AC-1 at the highest speed because low and medium mean different things across machines, and states plainly that efficacy and room coverage fall when a unit runs slower. A figure quoted off a box belongs to the fastest setting.

What the chamber does not have in it

Nothing keeps producing contaminant during the test, and nothing leaks in: the chamber is sealed, the source is a single injection, and what follows is a decay curve down to whatever the instruments can read.

A flat does neither. Cooking, the corridor, window gaps and the front door keep feeding it while the machine works, so the concentration settles at a balance point instead of falling away, and that balance is what a resident experiences.

AHAM is direct about the boundary. Its FAQ says the chamber is not intended to represent a certain size room in a home, describing it instead as a standard chamber allowing accurate, repeatable measurement. The EPA puts the consequence plainly: a portable air cleaner may not achieve its rated CADR under all circumstances, though the value allows comparisons among them.

So the figure describes a machine; the room stays a separate question. A test that let the room vary would produce numbers nobody could line up, which is why the chamber was fixed in the first place.

Turning a rate into a room

AHAM publishes one conversion, and it uses only the smoke figure. Room size in square feet equals the smoke CADR multiplied by 1.55, and the square metre version multiplies that result by 0.093. The suggested room size printed on a seal is that arithmetic.

Three assumptions ride inside the 1.55: the room size is set at an 80 percent reduction in smoke particles at steady state, one air change per hour arrives from outside and adjoining rooms, and the ceiling is eight feet. AHAM states the last as a caveat: a higher ceiling means the square footage covered comes out below the figure shown.

The relationship was not invented for marketing. AHAM records that it was verified by scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and recognised as reasonable by the US Federal Trade Commission. The same arithmetic caps what the method predicts: at the top smoke figure of 450, the largest room is 698 square feet, or 64.8 square metres.

For a ceiling that is not eight feet, the honest calculation runs on volume. AHAM gives the clean air changes a machine delivers as the smoke CADR multiplied by 60, divided by the room volume in cubic feet. Floor area alone overstates coverage in any room built taller than the assumption.

  • Clean air changes per hour
    1
    Particles held out, at steady state
    45 percent
    What that point represents
    The infiltration the room size assumes
  • Clean air changes per hour
    2
    Particles held out, at steady state
    62 percent
    What that point represents
    Well below the certified basis
  • Clean air changes per hour
    4.8
    Particles held out, at steady state
    80 percent
    What that point represents
    Where the suggested room size is set
  • Clean air changes per hour
    6
    Particles held out, at steady state
    83 percent
    What that point represents
    Three points for a quarter more machine
  • Clean air changes per hour
    10
    Particles held out, at steady state
    89 percent
    What that point represents
    Twice the rate, nine points more

Where the five air changes came from

The familiar advice to aim for about five air changes an hour is the same rule written a second way. Divide 60 minutes by an eight foot ceiling multiplied by 1.55 and the answer is 4.84, which AHAM rounds down to 4.8 for its seal. Room size and air changes are one statement, not two pieces of evidence.

AHAM's own table shows what buying past that point returns: 45 percent removal at one clean air change per hour, 80 percent at 4.8, and 89 percent at ten. The curve flattens hard above the certified point, so a machine sized far beyond the room spends on the shallow part of it.

Ventilation is a different measure with a similar shape, and the two get conflated. AHAM notes that air changes per hour describes outdoor air entering a building, refreshing rather than cleaning it, and uses equivalent air changes for what filtration contributes. Filtration recirculates and brings nothing in.

What the seal deliberately leaves out

The certification covers three particle results and stops there. AHAM's programme guide states that only the CADR for tobacco smoke, dust and pollen is certified, and that no implication may be made that the seal covers any other feature. Gases, odours and microbiological components sit outside AC-1, and so do sound and ozone emissions.

Each of those went off to a separate document. Sound got its own standard in AHAM AC-2, filter loading was drafted as AC-3, and microbial reduction became a separate international document reporting its result as m-CADR. A high particle figure predicts none of them.

Filter life and running cost are absent for related reasons. The certified result is tied to one identified filter, and where a model is sold with alternatives, AHAM requires the literature to say the rating rests on a named filter and may be affected by using another. Power draw enters only for energy-verified models.

The protective move here is short. Where a listing prints a CADR figure beside an odour or germ claim, the two are unconnected: AHAM's rules require non-particulate claims to be kept distinct from certified ones. Ask which pollutant the figure belongs to, and read the rest of the packaging as a separate document.

Which machines the number was built for

AC-1 was written for portable room air cleaners, appliances placed in a room during use. AHAM excludes whole-house cleaners mounted in ductwork, because their particle dynamics and airflow patterns differ, and states that CADR claims for those units are not comparable to AC-1 claims. A ducted system carrying a filtration figure was measured some other way.

Split systems sit in a third position. The international method, IEC 63086-1, covers combination products including air conditioners with an air cleaning function, and says its test methods "are only aimed at their air cleaning function when tested". A cooling machine can be given a clean air figure that describes the filtration alone.

Singapore names the metric without setting a number against it. The NEA page on air cleaning devices tells haze buyers what the rate means: the clean air a device can produce for a room, which alongside the room size supports an informed purchase. No minimum is published, and no local scheme certifies the figure, so whatever appears on a box here was measured somewhere else.

Common questions

What does a CADR rating actually measure?
It reports the clean air delivery rate for a single particle type, combining how much air the machine moves with how well its filter captures that particle. It is a volume per time, never a percentage of the room cleaned.
Why does one air purifier list three CADR numbers?
The standard tests the same machine against smoke, dust and pollen, and reports a separate figure for each because particle sizes differ. A single number would hide which particles a unit handles best.
Does a high CADR cover odours and gases?
No. The certification covers particle types only, so odours, cooking fumes and solvent vapours sit outside it and need a sorbent stage instead.
Is CADR measured at the highest fan speed?
Yes, the test runs at the top setting in a sealed chamber. Real rooms leak and keep producing contaminants, so the figure describes the machine rather than the room.

Sources

  1. Frequently Asked Questions about Testing of Portable Air Cleaners (2020 Update)

    Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM Verifide) · Checked

    CADR uses a 1,008 cu ft chamber, three particle bands, top fan speed.

  2. Consumer Room Air Cleaners and Equivalent Air Changes per Hour (January 2026)

    Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) · Checked

    Suggested room size uses 4.8 ACH; 1 to 10 eACH spans 45% to 89%.

  3. Air Cleaning Devices

    National Environment Agency (Singapore) · Checked

    NEA defines CADR as the clean air a device produces for a room.

Ready to get started?

Tell us what’s going on. Symptoms, setup, photos, anything we should know. We’ll assess and come back with the right next step.

WhatsApp us